ZOYKUHot Board

slee-persis/gvs5hDokumentation

GVS5H: Five Qwen3.8-27B Models Match Claude Fable 5 on LiveCodeBench Hard | Fable 5 Level Coding for a Fifth the Price - or on a Single GPU

Sprach-Hinweis:Es ist keine lokalisierte Dokumentation verfügbar. Es wird das offizielle englische Original angezeigt.
Schnellinstallation
pip install gvs5h

Persis Persis Capital Inc. Research

arXiv:2608.26480 Hacker News discussion Code license: MIT Paper and data license: CC BY 4.0

#1 on Hacker News, 2026-10-25 slee-persis%2FGVS5H | Trendshift

Results | Running the code | License


GVS5H (Gorilla vs. 5 Humans): Five Qwen3.8-27B Models Match Claude Fable 5 on LiveCodeBench Hard

Five boys standing on one another's shoulders, together as tall as a single gorilla beside them

Results

Accuracy on LiveCodeBench, single call versus with manager, for seven models against Claude Fable 5's single-call score

Opus 5 ran on an earlier version of the scaffold, in a single pass served through OpenRouter rather than five on a pinned backend.

Average cost per task against accuracy, single call versus with manager, on a log-scale cost axis

What one pass costs — LCB-100, 5 passes, single call vs manager, against Fable 5

Abstract. Frontier coding performance is typically bought with larger proprietary models at high cost. We introduce ledger-based zero-shot self-orchestration, a training-free method in which fresh instances of one model decompose problems and coordinate through a shared filesystem holding a plan, notes and current solution. Across eleven open and closed-weight models on the 100 latest hard LiveCodeBench problems, the method yields gains of up to 25.6 percentage points on pinned backends and offers two routes to frontier-level accuracy. Orchestrated Qwen3.8 Flash Next reaches 93.0% pass@1 against Fable 5's 90.4% at 9% of the cost, and locally served, open-weight Qwen3.8-27B rises from 66.8% to 92.4%. Gains are not universal: some models are unchanged or worse. Transcript analysis attributes the gain to decomposition and persistent context. Inference-time organization can approach frontier coding accuracy at a fraction of the cost, or slightly exceed it on self-hostable weights.

— the paper

Running the code

Needs uv and an API key for the model you want to test.

cd codebase/v2-current
export OPENAI_API_KEY=...

LCB_RELEASE=release_v6 \
ESCALATION_CLOUD_MAX_TOKENS=128000 \
ESCALATION_CLOUD_TIMEOUT=7200 \
MULTIAGENT_MODEL=openai:gpt-5.6-terra \
uv run --no-project --python 3.12 --with 'datasets<4' --with numpy --with anthropic \
  python escalation/run_bench.py --engine multiagent --only lcb --lcb 100 --parallel 8
  • --engine multiagent runs the manager; --engine single is the one-call baseline.
  • Other models: anthropic:<model>, dashscope:<model>, openrouter:<model>, each with its own *_API_KEY.
  • The pass@1 score prints at the end. Results are written to runs/results.json, workspaces to runs/ws/.

License

Code is under the MIT License. The paper, figures and run data are under CC BY 4.0. The LiveCodeBench fork, the benchmark problem statements and the LaTeX template files keep their own licenses. See NOTICE.md for which license covers which path.

Dokumentationsspiegel archiviert aus dem offiziellen GitHub-Repository · GitHub-Repository aufrufen
Snapshot-Datum: 2026-11-09